[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Who Are You (Single Edit)” – The Who
(Words/music: Pete Townshend, available on Thirty Years of Maximum R&B, MCA 1994) 

The Who sounded fine last night at the Super Bowl – not quite revelatory yet not quite embarrassing – and provided enough overly-obvious age-related fuel for people who think that they are funny.  The band’s medley of CSI theme songs sidestepped the question I wondered going into the weekend – would Roger Daltrey still sing the “who the fuck are you” line in “Who Are You?”

In reality, I knew it wouldn’t happen; I imagine that Super Bowl producers have snipers waiting for anyone who might go off script.  I only raise this question because this is an obscenity that frequently makes its way onto the radio.  It doesn’t happen every time, but it happens regularly enough for me to stop noticing it as something out of the ordinary.  I don’t mention this because I’m offended, but rather that I’m curious.  Sure, Daltrey runs through the line quickly, but it’s not exactly a subtle obscenity either.  If nothing else, I’m fascinated by it – do radio programmers not notice it, or did someone sign off on it? In any case, I found this far more interesting than commenting on the band’s age this weekend.

More on The Who: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: the who | Pete Townshend | roger daltrey | 1975 | 1994 | 1970s | super bowl | MCA records | obscenities |
8 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Join Together” - The Who
(Words/music: Pete Townshend, available on Thirty Years of Maximum R&B, MCA 1994)

“Join Together” evokes mixed feelings in me as someone who things about music.  As a song, “Join Together” doesn’t belong among the Who’s best songs yet sits right at the top of their second tier.  The mouth harp and the penny whistle near the end makes it a little goofy, but overall it’s a fine rock single propelled along by Keith Moon’s start/stop drumming.  I’m talking about the ideas that the song presents about the role of music.  “Join Together,” released as a single in 1972, was part of Pete Townshend’s Lifehouse project – a rock opera (that later became the songs on Who’s Next) about a dystopian future where music was the only refuge from a large, internet-like “grid” that all of humanity was connected to (Wikipedia probably explains it a little better).  The song suggests that music, in particular live music, serves as a uniting force.  I wholeheartedly agree with this idea; concerts provide an opportunity to leave behind the stress of our everyday lives and join a bunch of strangers for a night of music we all love.  I’m a fairly friendly guy, but I’m much more likely to strike up a conversation with a stranger at a concert than I am in the supermarket.  Even if we have similarities in both instances (“oh, you like peanut butter too?”), there seems to be a more immediate and natural connection with strangers with music as a common ground.  Wilco’s Jeff Tweedy has compared live music to religious services in a number of interviews, and undoubtedly he’s talking about the communal aspect of these shows – how a group of people can put everything else aside for an evening to “join together” with everyone else.

So I’m on board with the song’s main idea, but I’m not as quick to buy the first line in the last verse - “It’s the singer not the song / that makes the music move along.”  In the context of Townshend’s Lifehouse, the band is the essential uniting force.  However, taking “Join Together” as a mission statement makes accepting this line a bit tougher for me.  Over the last six months, I’ve been looking at individual songs and tried to figure out what makes them tick (or, at least, why I like them).  Occasionally, I slip into a tangential story, but I try to return back to the song.  Yes, I’ve talked a lot about specific performances or interpretations, and I agree that sometimes a song becomes better with the right performer behind it – it’s hard to doubt that certain people “own” certain songs, whether they wrote them or they’re covering them.  I’d also like to think that the opposite is true – that certain songs (to a degree) transcend performance.  Of course, it’s possible to butcher even the best songs, but some songs don’t need a specific performer’s gift in order to fulfill it’s potential.  Perhaps it’s just the right chords or the right melody sequence.  Maybe it’s the song’s ability to tap into something about our shared human existence.  Regardless, just as there are performers that make certain songs sound better, there are certain songs that transcend their singers.  If the singer makes the music move along, the song is the essential roadmap – and without a set of directions, the singer’s going nowhere.

More on The Who: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: the who | Pete Townshend | 1972 | 1970s | track analysis | MCA records | broad theories about music |
4 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Blinded by the Light” – Manfred Mann’s Earth Band
(Words/music: Bruce Springsteen, available on The Roaring Silence, Warner Brothers 1976)

During his VH-1 Storytellers’ performance, Bruce Springsteen introduced “Blinded by the Light” as his only number one song and noted the irony that it was someone else’s performance that made it a hit.  While I (certainly of a pro-Springsteen bias, so take that for what you will) prefer the original from Springsteen’s debut record Greetings from Asbury Park, N.J., Manfred Mann’s version remains the more popular one.  Springsteen semi-jokingly attributes the cover’s success to Mann’s skewering of the “deuce” coup to sound more like “douche.”  It’s interesting, because I think one area where the cover improves on the original comes in Mann’s clearer vocal delivery.  The young Boss was still trying hard to be Bob Dylan, and perhaps dipped a little too much into his rhyming dictionary.  Mann’s version makes these lyrics, which are generally nonsensical to begin with, somewhat clearer, which is the only reason that makes me believe that his pronunciation of “deuce” was intentional.

With these dense lyrics, both songs rely on the music to carry the weight.  Springsteen’s version feels incredibly loose, letting the beat swing and the saxophone dance around the stage; even though it’s not one of my favorite Springsteen lyrics, it’s clear that he was having fun leading his band.  Mann’s cover reverses this, going for a machine-like gloss.  Swirling synthesizers replace the strums and saxophones as Mann’s band shifts speeds, playing with a half-time feel in the verse and resuming the beat to move into the chorus.  It’s these rhythmic touches that build and release tension over the song’s seven minutes, even playing with the listener’s expectations by dropping down to only a hi-hat and synthesizer (which I hope he paid royalties to Pete Townshend for, since it sounds right out of his arsenal) for the chorus when we might expect it to crescendo to a climax.   Ultimately, it comes down to personal taste, and even if I prefer the original, there are elements of the cover that I enjoy as well.  Most of all, I’m amused to see how one song lends itself to two diverse versions.  I’d be interested to know what Manfred Mann heard in Springsteen’s original that led him to arrange the song the way he arranged it.

More on Manfred Mann’s Earth Band: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: manfred mann's earth band | 1976 | 1970s | track comparison | cover song | Bruce Springsteen | Pete Townshend |
1 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Drowned (live)” – Pete Townshend
(Words/music: Pete Townshend, available on The Oceanic Concerts, Rhino Records 2001)

The Who had so many unique personalities that each of the four members probably gave up recognition simply by being around such distinctive players.  Still, these four members made up one of the most influential bands of their era (and a band I deem as underrated only because they’re too often in the “second tier” behind The Beatles (rightfully), Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin, and frequently Pink Floyd – I’d take The Who over the last three any day of the week).  One of the best parts of these songs was the controlled chaos contained in these songs; Roger Daltrey used his incredible vocal range liberally, John Entwistle redefined the bass player’s role, and Keith Moon’s insane syncopation created generations of really bad drummers trying to imitate him.  This leaves Pete Townshend as the foundation for the group, and while he could tear up a guitar solo with the best of them (more on that in a minute), his role as songwriter and sonic architect came first.  Townsend created the venue for his band members to run wild, often letting the best parts of his songs come from other people (the scream at the end of “Won’t Get Fooled Again,” the bass fills in “My Generation,” and any of a number of memorable Keith Moon moments).  Many times, these arrangements clouded the true genius – Townshend’s remarkable chops as a songwriter.  It’s easy to see how a band with two rock virtuosos (Entwistle and Townshend) and two of the most iconic performers on their instruments (Daltrey and Moon), that the songs might take second billing (after all, Daltrey sings “it’s the singer not the song, that makes the music move along” on “Join Together”), but Townshend wrote some of the most intricate and powerful songs of his generation.  Personally, I think Townshend reached his apex on 1973’s Quadrophenia – the perfect combination of an album long narrative without sacrificing individual songs.  Quadrophenia plays almost like a classical piece – different musical themes (representing the four “characters” in the band) enter and exit the piece at different points, appearing in different variations when the narrative calls for them.  On an entirely different level, the story tackles themes we all struggle with – self-identification, the longing for purpose, the capacity to love and to be loved – even after the teenage wounds start to close up.  I started giving Quadrophenia as a high school graduation gift when I was in college in part because it captures that time in one’s life and in part because it’s an album that more people need to hear.

So, when I came across The Oceanic Concerts a few years ago, I was eager to hear how Townshend and pianist/harpist Raphael Rudd would transform some of Townshend’s compositions.  In particular, Townshend’s solo interpretation of “Drowned” stood out, perhaps because I thought of it as one of the less likely songs to benefit from a barebones arrangement.  On Quadrophenia, “Drowned” gathers its strength from a complex arrangement that relies on contrasts – the grand piano breaks abruptly shattered by Moon’s thunderous fills, Daltrey’s theatrically varied vocals, and the shift from the loose feel in the song to a taut reprise of the horns from “5:15.”  It also features an extended electric guitar solo from Townshend, something that doesn’t usually translate well into the singer-songwriter mode.  Still, I think I came away from this version of “Drowned” impressed with Townshend the performer.  He varies his style at several points, touching on his trademark grace note filled chord changes with intricate finger picking, recreating the verse-chorus textual difference of the original.  When it comes time for the middle section, his performance makes it sound like his fingers are in a blur; he quickly strangles out chords while still managing to play a melody line through this burst of chordal chaos.  It almost sounds like two guitars playing at once.  Most impressively, he’s ready to snap right back into a more restrained style when it comes time to sing again (and he sings capably – he’s no Daltrey, but he does his songs justice).  Even decades later, Townshend’s performance sounds fresh – his avant-garde descendents could learn something from the master still.  This performance (and a handful of others on this album) give Townshend the opportunity that he sometimes doesn’t get in his own band – the chance to be both the gifted performer and skilled writer.

More on Pete Townshend: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: 2000s | 2001 | classical music reference | live performance | pete townshend | reissued | rhino records | somewhat dubious comparison to literature | the who | track analysis | classic rock |
2 Tumblr Notes

Based on a theme created by: Roy David Farber and Hunson. Powered By: Tumblr | Email SSC
1 of 1
Email Me: Email No spam please.