[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Champagne Supernova (Live)” – Stephen Malkmus and the Jicks
(Words/music: Noel Gallagher, live at the Cat’s Cradle, 11 November 2001

From his days fronting Pavement, Stephen Malkmus has a legendary reputation in the world of alternative rock.  Over time, his reputation evolved, particularly to include the guitar heroism on his recent solo albums, but in general Malkmus is known for his sarcasm, his way with words, and his disjointed songs.  He also has a tremendous sense of humor and an acute sense of the absurd, and from the first Pavement album through his most recent solo release, his songs contain numerous non-sequiturs, nonsensical digressions, and surrealist images.  Part of digesting a Malkmus recording is deciphering his skewered viewpoint and appreciating the humor.

Malkmus’ playfulness takes centerstage on this recording of his band covering Oasis’ overblown epic.  Appropriately, Malkmus’ version teeters between mockery and reverence, ultimately striking the proper balance between the two.  As a card-carrying Oasis fan (and someone who gets upset when radio stations fade out before the guitar solo), I will still acknowledge the ridiculousness of “Champagne Supernova,” both in its extended arrangement and its lyrics.  Malkmus twists the lyrics both to mock the original (hence the reference to a Coke can pipe) and reflect on the drug-laden mid ‘90s that helped birth the song.  Despite this mockery, Malkmus giddily declares the lead guitar his “favorite part” before playing the lick perfectly.  Yes, it’s overblown and absurd, but that’s part of the song’s charm, and Malkmus capitalizes on the song’s character.  Sure, he’s tossing off lines about being a “natural Englishman” and about ecstasy “raining from the sky,” but he’s also staying faithful to the song’s arrangement.  It’s this blend of admiration and absurdity that not only captures Malkmus’ interpretation of the song, but Malkmus’ legacy as well.  Ultimately, one appreciates this cover similar to one of his songs – while the humor might be more exaggerated here, it’s foiled by solid musicianship and a respect for the source material.

More on Stephen Malkmus: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: Stephen Malkmus | the jicks | pavement | 2001 | cover song | live recording | Matador | oasis | noel gallagher |
3 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Setting Sun” – The Chemical Brothers with Noel Gallagher
(Words/music: Noel Gallagher, Tom Rowlands, and Ed Simons, available on Dig Your Own Hole, Astralwerks 1996)

Even Oasis apologists won’t deny the Gallagher brothers’ overt Beatles’ emulations, and if they lifted a few moves from the Beatles, then Noel certainly took notes on “Tomorrow Never Knows” before making “Setting Sun” with the Chemical Brothers.  The Beatles’ track stands as one of the band’s most experimental moments, including the birth of automatic doubletracking, alternate vocal amplification methods, and a backwards, pitch-shifted guitar solo among others (Wikipedia’s entry on the song goes into future detail for you gearheads).  Gallagher and the Chemical Brothers used a lot of these techniques for similar effects.  They even use a dramatically similar beat as the basis of “Setting Sun.”

Even with shared pieces, the final puzzles differ in both tone and purpose.  The Beatles track, largely composed by John Lennon (McCartney brought the tape loops and Ringo accidentally titled it), grew out of an experience with LSD and draws on the “mind expanding” qualities the drug purportedly offers.  It’s somewhere between a hallucination and a meditation.  Conversely, “Setting Sun” attacks intensely with the abrupt shifts and jarring sounds.  Perhaps it’s an easy association, but hallucinogenics in the 1990s were often associated with these intense, rave-like situations rather than the meditative, mind-expanding experiments in the 1960s.  Appropriately, Gallagher’s lyrics flirt with danger and seduction, as they could either be a vague come-on to someone in a dance club or merely a flirtation with some kind of social taboo.  Either way, it offered Gallagher the opportunity to create something more intense than his day job while also offering the Chemical Brothers the opportunity to align their big beat sound with a historical musical thread.

More on The Chemical Brothers: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: 1990s | 1996 | astralwerks | noel gallagher | oasis | the chemical brothers | the beatles |
13 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Some Might Say (Live on MTV Unplugged)” – Oasis
(Words/music: Noel Gallagher, originally appeared on (What’s the Story) Morning Glory?, Epic 1995)

I fell hard for Oasis in the mid ‘90s, and in many ways they were just as big of a “gateway band” as the others that come to mind first (R.E.M., Nirvana, etc).  Off the top of my head, Oasis led me to Paul Weller (and the Jam), Blur, and the reviews section of Q Magazine.  Like Oasis, Q was fairly mainstream (and kind of trashy), but in the early days of the internet, it was one of the places I went looking for new music when the domestic magazines failed to catch my attention.  I haven’t read Q in years, and that’s probably the same length of time it’s been since I’ve listened to a full Oasis album.  Regardless, the news this week that Noel Gallagher left Oasis prompted two distinct responses.  First, I felt a tinge of sadness – even though we went our separate ways a few years back, I kept tabs on the band the way one might keep tabs on an old flame through Facebook – I wanted to know that they were healthy, happy, and successful with the occasional reminder why we split in the first place.  Secondly, I was surprised that it took this long.

Aside from the feuding (which gave the band that explosive “crash waiting to happen” energy that made things more exciting), Oasis seemed like a one-sided partnership.  Noel Gallagher wrote the songs while Liam Gallagher sang them.  Granted, Noel seized vocals a few times, and Liam had a marginally better voice (and stage presence), but it seemed like this imbalance would make the split an inevitability – Noel would have the better post-Oasis career because he still had the songs.  This is why I’ve always loved this recording of their MTV Unplugged performance.  In this setting, the songs (from the first two albums, plus a couple B-sides) get a horn section and vocals from Noel (who subbed for a “sick” Liam who sat in the balcony and heckled all night).  Maybe it’s the expanded band that’s influencing my opinion, but I don’t really miss Liam’s vocals.  In this setting, “Some Might Say” gets a loftier arrangement that pushes it closer to sounding like an anthem.  This was always Noel Gallagher’s prerogative as a songwriter, as he wrote songs to fill stadiums even when they played clubs.  Liam gave the band stadium-sized stage presence, but Noel’s songs sold the tickets.  Even if he hasn’t matched his early output in years, I’d put my money on Noel as the most successful Gallagher solo project.

(Of course, he could be back in the band in a week.  That’s how these things work.)

More on Oasis: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: oasis | 1995 | 1990s | mtv unplugged | noel gallagher | liam gallagher |
4 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Lithium” – Nirvana
(Words/music: Kurt Cobain, available on Nevermind, DGC 1991)

If you really want to know, I have two “first albums” because I bought two at the same time.  If given fifteen minutes and a calendar, I could probably pinpoint the exact day I bought them as well.  October 1997, I was a freshman in high school and had been listening to the radio for the better part of a year.  I’d make tapes off the radio, sitting with my boom box in my room with my finger ready on the red record button, ready to commit the next song to one of my Maxell 90 minute tapes (which I have shoeboxes of).  I consumed radio (and MTV, and to a lesser extent VH-1) as much as I could until waiting to hear songs on the radio simply wasn’t enough.  So while on the way home from a family get together and a stop at a Borders’ Books, I bought an old record and a current record.  The “current” album was Oasis’ Be Here Now, a record that’s unfairly maligned even if it’s not as good as the first two, and the “old” record was Nevermind.  Looking back, 1996-1997 wasn’t that far removed from the whole grunge thing, so Nirvana still received regular play on modern rock stations (hell, they still get their fair share these days), so it makes sense that I’d buy an album that had been on my radar for years (I remember where I was when Kurt Cobain died, even if I only had a casual understanding of who he was).

Today I own an embarrassing amount of music (I measure my iTunes by months now), but back then when my money came from birthdays and babysitting my neighbors, new music never came frequently enough.  This, along with the obsessiveness of my teenage years, led to me living with albums for a prolonged period of time, and Nevermind is one that I did a considerable amount of living with.  I probably listened to it on an average of three or four times a week for the first two years I owned it.  I taught myself how to play the drums with the first half of Nevermind, and to this day I instinctively start moving my hands and feet along to certain phrases in the album (not to mention a collection of broken drum sticks from trying to play like Dave Grohl).  I haven’t listened to some of these songs in ages, but I probably know them better than songs I’ve heard multiple times in the last month as they trigger something – emotional memories, muscle memory, who knows – in me when I hear them.  This is probably one of the reasons I rarely listen to Nevermind anymore – it’s so loaded with personal associations of those painfully awkward years that’s it’s hard to hear the songs without my own personal context rising back up.

Listening to “Lithium” now, it strikes me as the perfect example of the “Nirvana sound.”  Sure it has the soft/loud/soft dynamic that everyone points out (and yes, that the Pixies did first and probably better), but there’s so much more that makes this song work.  The slinky guitar line through the verse stands out immediately as it snakes through Dave Grohl’s bright sounding ride cymbal and Krist Novoselic’s minimal yet perfect bass line.  Cobain sings in a clean and (relatively) bright sounding tone (at least compared with some of the other songs on Nevermind).  Then, with a quick click of the distortion pedal, Cobain’s guitar becomes a wave of distortion, Grohl starts bashing at his ride cymbal (the only way to get those deep, violent crash sounds), and Novoselic’s bass becomes instantly more melodic.  Meanwhile, Cobain switches from his bleak poetry to a sea of “yeahs” – content to let his melody alone ride the cresting waves of sound without words.  Some might think it’s a copout to have a lyric-less chorus, but it takes a tremendous amount of faith that the melody will keep things interesting (and it does), but it also continues with the contrast in the dynamics; the verses are subdued and somewhat morose, but when the chorus hits the mood shifts to joyous and sing-songy (almost like, uh, taking lithium as an antidepressant?).  Cobain comes out of the chorus declaring his conflicted moods – he likes it, misses it, loves you, kills you, all while declaring that he’s “not going to crack.”  After his suicide, it’s convenient to declare “Lithium” as a portrayal of Cobain’s own fragile mental state, but it’s really a case in excellent songwriting where the music and the words work together to tell a story and convey emotion.  No wonder a teenager would latch on to this.

More on Nirvana: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: 1990s | 1991 | DGC | alternative rock | dave grohl | kurt cobain | nirvana | oasis | personal reflection | grunge | my first record |
Based on a theme created by: Roy David Farber and Hunson. Powered By: Tumblr | Email SSC
1 of 1
Email Me: Email No spam please.