[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Gloria (In Excelsis Deo / Gloria (Version))” – Patti Smith
(Words/music: Patti Smith and Van Morrison, available on Horses, Arista 1975)

Someone reading about “Gloria” without ever hearing it would imagine that Patti Smith delivers the opening line to the song through clenched teeth.  Instead, one of the first recorded artifacts of the New York punk rock scene begins closer to a whisper than a scream.  Smith lets out her signature line with a measured pace and restrained tone.  It’s not as angst-ridden or sensationalist as it is a statement of the facts.  After all, she’s not denying religion – she’s just saying that it’s not her thing.

Even if this is the most famous line in her song (only rivaled by the hook in “Because the Night”), it’s not her thesis statement.  That comes late on in the verse when she goes a step further, declaring that her sings “belong to me.”  Until this point, Smith continues with the restrained tone of her first few lines until she reaches this declaration.  When she repeats the word “me,” she lingers and sneers at it, letting the note bend slightly.  This is the moment where Smith picks up, letting the swagger in her voice take over as the song crescendos head-on into Van Morrison’s “Gloria.” As the song progresses, Smith’s narrator takes the ownership of her sins as empowerment, fusing a sense of action and control with the sexual energy in Morrison’s original.   By the end of the song (and the return of that infamous first line), Smith’s persona becomes fully formed.  The measured pace of the opening gives way to Smith’s surrealist, self-empowered narrator.  Rather than take her cues from anyone else (the Divine included), Smith’s persona acts on her own accord, bending the will of others (or others’ songs) to fit her own vision.

More on Patti Smith: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: patti smith | 1975 | 1970s | van morrison | lenny kaye | arista records | punk | punk rock | surrealism |
21 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Possession” – Sarah McLachlan
(Words/music: Sarah McLachlan, available on Fumbling Towards Ecstacy, Arista 1993)

When Sarah McLachlan retires to the Canadian countryside, the Lilith Fair will be the biggest part of her legacy.  While the fair was fodder for jokes (and, in retrospect, helped fill playlists in Starbucks nationwide), it provided a tremendous spotlight for female musical acts.  These days, she’s most commonly seen in those super depressing (which I guess means “super effective”) commercials for the ASPCA with all the sad looking animals.  These commercials use her song “Angel,” a piano ballad mourning someone who recently died.  It’s a song that’s become a convenient pop-cultural requiem, popping up whenever someone needs to soundtrack a montage of the recently deceased (and sure enough, someone on YouTube made a video for Michael Jackson using this song).  As someone who believes that a song contains many meanings to many people, I’m fine with this even if I think it’s a superficial interpretation.  McLachlan’s revealed in interviews that she wrote the song for deceased Smashing Pumpkins touring musician Jonathan Melvoin after overdosing on heroin.  Looking past the titular line, the song describes someone who buckles under his addictions – specifically, someone who only finds peace when they have passed on.  This makes sense in the context of Jackson (or even those poor rescued animals), but perhaps not for someone’s great grandmother who dies of natural causes.  Then again, who am I to judge – we all have our own demons, and that’s just my reading of the song.

Still, my point is that McLachlan gets lumped in with the rest of the Paste Magazine, Starbucks counter adorning singer-songwriters singing middle of the road songs, but many of McLachlan’s songs run deeper than face value.  Take “Possession” – a song famously written based on letters McLachlan received from a stalker.  It can be read as a song about obsessive love, which naturally some people will interpret as “passionate love” or “unrequited love,” but McLachlan fills her song with so many charged words and phrases.  The narrator feels “betrayed,” “trapped,” and finds truth “enslaved” and wants to “kiss you so hard” and “take your breath away.”  McLachlan fills the arrangement with minor chords and electronically affected drums that give the song an icy feeling almost like it’s the stranger making eyes at you from across the room.  McLachlan’s vocals are strong but largely stay in the safe area in her vocal register, however, when she lets her voice climb to the top of her range on key lines (the “I won’t be denied” line in particular), it underscores some of the more disturbing parts of her lyric.  It’s a song that, like a prospective disturbed lover, doesn’t reveal all of its secrets right away.  If it came out fifteen years later, it would have been quoted all over Facebook walls and AIM away messages.  I’d like to blame them, but it’s darkly seductive and hides its pathos well.  Sure, interpretation lies in the individual, but make sure you read the details closely before making that next mix tape for a potential romantic interest.

More on Sarah McLachlan: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: sarah mclachlan | michael jackson | 1993 | 1990s | track analysis | arista records | lilith fair | misinterpretations |
4 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Under the Milky Way” – The Church
(Words/music: Karin Jansson and Steve Kilbey, available on Starfish, Arista 1988)

While I love carefully arranged, dense songs, sometimes a simple, straight-forward arrangement best suits a song.  “Under the Milky Way” thrives with a simple arrangement that drives its two key elements –the bright and cutting acoustic guitar chords and Steve Kilbey’s voice.  Even if Kilbey sounds like a more dour Bono at times (particularly when he over-pronounces the word “white”), it’s this slight element of sadness that makes this song so beautiful.  When he sings the chorus, he sounds deflated and vaguely frustrated.  The other elements, in particular the humming synthesizer lurking near the back of the arrangement, help to cultivate this mood.   Even the bagpipes (I think they’re bagpipes, at least) in the post-chorus section help to cast a somber tone on the entire song.  Most importantly, these extra accessories are just that – while other songs rely on these flourishes (and to great effect, but that’s not the point), the band wisely keeps the guitar and Kilbey at the forefront of the mix.  Even with the atmospheric touches, “Under the Milky Way” retains the feeling of a single (lonely) person playing guitar and singing the song.

Maybe because of this underlying intimacy or because of its beautifully simple arrangement, I’ve always thought of this song as a song that I wish I could play and sing.  I’m not a very experienced guitar player (I think in another post I’ve said that I can play “campfire guitar” – give me open chords and I can fake it), but I can play the chords in this song.  Still, even though I was playing the right notes, it didn’t feel right; when I thought about it, it sounded like “Under the Milky Way,” but it only resembled the song slightly.  Perhaps I didn’t have the right voicings, but more than likely it sounded off because it wasn’t my song the way I played it.  Some songs are universal in their performances – they shine through a variety of interpretations.  Others, and I think “Under the Milky Way” falls into this category, require the subtle touch that its songwriter instinctively adds.  I suppose if I played around with the chords long enough, I could adapt my own subtleties, but I would much rather listen to the recording and appreciate it rather than try to replicate it.  If some art inspires others to create, other works inspire admiration, and “Under the Milky Way” falls into that second category for me.

More on The Church: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: the church | 1988 | 1980s | track analysis | arista records | bono | songs I wish I could play |
14 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Feel to Believe” – Beth Orton
(Words/music: Beth Orton, appears on Central Reservation, Arista Records 1999)

Today’s post goes out in tribute to Freaky Trigger’s 10th Anniversary.  I offer the shout out at the beginning of the post for two reasons.  First, I hold FT’s Tom Ewing in high regard and consider him one of my favorite writers and critics today.  His Poptimist columns for Pitchfork are among my favorite pieces of criticism and always make me look back at my own taste as a consumer of culture.  Also, I’d be remiss if I didn’t thank Tom for linking to me, as I’m sure there’s a considerable amount of you who would not be reading me otherwise.  (Also, I hope Tom isn’t bothered by having a Beth Orton song “dedicated” to him!)  Additionally, as part of FT’s retrospective, Tom linked to his first entry – a “mission statement” of sorts that certainly dovetails with my own philosophy as a critic and still applies a decade later.  This is fortuitous because I’ve been planning on using tomorrow’s Some Songs Considered post to write about my philosophy of music (at least in how it applies to this blog).  Reading Tom’s first post and then thinking of a song that served as important to my taste in 1999 (I was 16 in ’99, for the record) gives me the opportunity to give a bit of a preview to tomorrow’s post.

Today, I consider my taste fairly broad; I’m not as versed in the “poptimist” label as I should be, but I imagine that I would have more in common with them than not.  The first two axioms in his “Triggerism” post – “there’s a stunning amount of worthwhile music out there” and “music isn’t confined by time or genre” – are statements I couldn’t have put better myself.  Even looking at the (somewhat odd) collection of songs so far this past month and realizing that this is only scratching the surface of my music collection reinforces my broad tastes.  I find that in different eras and different musical movements, there are worthwhile songs and worthless songs, and that the best songs transcend genre, era, and circumstances. 

Still, I haven’t always felt this way.

When I first got into music (relatively late, for I didn’t listen to music until the summer before my freshman year of high school), I was a strict rockist – it could be the angry alternative rock of the late 90s or the crushing classic rock of the 70s, but if it wasn’t played with guitars, I wanted no part of it.  This meant marginalizing a lot of wonderful music that I’m still catching up on.  To a degree, I think this is a natural evolution of taste – once we find something that speaks to us (whether it really resonates with us or we just want it to because it’s what we have access to – that’s an entirely separate debate) we take it and run with it.  Throw in the uncertainty of teenage years and many of us look for anything we can identify with (or, alternately, define ourselves by) while everything else is in flux.  For me, it took until sometime in college (and going through the punk rock rabbit hole) before I could start to embrace things outside of my “expertise.”

That’s not to say there weren’t a few cracks into my rock and roll armor.  Somehow, in 1999, Beth Orton’s Central Reservation album found me.  It was probably hearing the kind of guitar driven single “Stolen Car” on 120 Minutes that led me to the album, but the rest of her songs run the gamut from jazzy ballads to naked confessional folk to hazy, spaced-out electronic pieces.  It certainly was not like the Foo Fighters (one of my favorite bands at the time), but I loved it.  I used to listen to this album on repeat all the time when I wanted to hear something different (because one man can only listen to Nirvana’s MTV Unplugged so many times).  Could I resolve it with the other louder records?  Well, maybe with something like R.E.M., but at least R.E.M. had their “rock” moments (I also, quite accidentally and only in retrospect, found that this album brought me much more interaction with girls.  Unfortunately, I was too awkward and clueless to capitalize on that).  Still, it became part of my taste; Central Reservation proudly sat in my CD wallet with my Led Zeppelin and Rancid CDs, and I proudly defended it when my fellow rockist friends asked me why I owned something so “wussy” (an issue I ran into when I wrote music reviews for my high school paper and included a couple of less popular “pop” albums that I thought the high school audience at large would enjoy in 2001).

So, what exactly was it about this album that spoke to me.  Well, thinking back, I know I was drawn in by Beth Orton’s unique voice, and the whole thing didn’t quite sound like any singer-songwriter I knew at the time (again, I was fairly sheltered – the internet was in its infancy and most of my knowledge of anything that wasn’t on the radio came from reading magazines and books).  Above all, I’d like to think that it was the power of these well-written, well-performed songs that transcended genre.  Today, “Feel to Believe” stands out to me as one of the less ordained songs.  There are no late ‘90s electronic flourishes or strings or jazz brushes on snare drums to adorn the song – just Orton and her guitar.  It’s the kind of simplicity that seems like the kind of thing I could pull off only to realize that it takes a tremendous amount of talent to sound that effortless.  Listening to it again today, I’m taken by a moment about halfway through the song when Orton’s voice distorts slightly during the phrase, “each have got their own limit.”  Like on the last Kanye West album, it’s distortion as a signifier of emotional expression; however, while Kanye turned to technology to achieve these moments of distorted catharsis, Orton’s is a product of (what appears to be) technological limits as the microphone can’t contain the full weight of her voice.  It’s a fitting moment on Central Reservation, an album that uses a lot of late ‘90s technological aid well, that the most emotionally powerful moment comes as a result of a technological hiccup.

So tonight I’m raising my coffee to Freaky Trigger, wishing it another decade of success while wishing that I knew about it ten years ago when I needed to realize that there’s a lot more to music than three chords and some distortion.

More on Beth Orton: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: beth orton | 1999 | 1990s | arista records | alternative rock | track analysis | Shout Out | personal reflection |
3 Tumblr Notes

Based on a theme created by: Roy David Farber and Hunson. Powered By: Tumblr | Email SSC
1 of 1
Email Me: Email No spam please.