[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Walk Hard” – John C. Reilly
(Words/music: Judd Apatow, Marshall Crenshaw, Jake Kasdan, and John C. Reilly, available on Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story, Columbia 2007) 

A large part of the appeal to Walk Hard, aside from goofy jokes, comes from the earnestness of the film’s music.  John C. Reilly’s Dewey Cox shifts musical styles with the wind, and the film’s songs captured the different musical styles surprisingly well.  Sure, the lyrics were generally dumb (this is a Judd Apatow film, for what that’s worth), but the performances could pass as artifacts from their respective eras, at least from a distance.

The title track, Dewey Cox’s signature song, best captures the film’s musical successes.  Reilly turns in a solid Johnny Cash impression (even though his vocal tone is stronger than Cash’s) backed by a convincing arrangement mimicking Cash’s early output.  Of course, it helps that Marshal Crenshaw wrote the music, giving the song its seamless transitions and, ultimately, making it more than a series of Cash-related puns.  It’s difficult to take the song seriously while listening to the words, and even without paying attention it wouldn’t’ pass for one of Cash’s original recordings.  Still, from another room, it sounds like a serious and professional recording, and it’s this earnestness that makes the film funny in the first place.  If nothing else, “Walk Hard” works well as a sort of “souvenir” from the movie – a reminder of an afternoon spent giggling at a grown man wearing ridiculous outfits singing ridiculous songs.

More on John C. Reilly: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: john c reilly | dewey cox | marshall crenshaw | 2007 | 2000s | Columbia Records | soundtrack |
5 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Beds are Burning” – Midnight Oil
(Words/music: Rob Hirst, James Moginie, and Peter Garrett, available on Diesel and Dust, Columbia 1987)

Contradictions fascinate me, especially when I find them within myself.  “Beds are Burning” presents one I particularly find fascinating; I find myself completely at home in this song yet still feel like a stranger to it.  I’ll start with the familiarity.  Without fail, the first three notes of this song cause me to stop everything and exclaim “Midnight Oil.”  Depending on the context, friends and acquaintances treat this semi-involuntary response with a mix of bewilderment and reluctant respect.  I can’t play the song, I can’t identify the chords or the progression, and I don’t know a lot of the words, but those three notes immediately trigger recognition in my brain.  For whatever reason, years of sporadically hearing “Beds are Burning” seared those three notes into my brain, attaching a permanent association that earns me little more than odd looks from friends and the occasional point in a trivia competition.

Still, even if those three notes mean that I recognize the surroundings, I still feel like a stranger.  Midnight Oil wears their Australian heritage proudly, using their songs as a way to address issues they feel strongly about.  In particular, “Beds are Burning” rebukes the Australian government for their forcible displacement of Aborigine people in the 20th century.  They even used their performance of the song during the closing of the 2000 Olympics in Sydney as a soapbox, performing their best known song to their largest worldwide audience with the words “sorry” on their chests as a reference to the Australian government’s refusal to issue a formal apology.  While I can identify with the general call-to-consciousness in the chorus, the song’s finer details only highlight that I know little to nothing about the Aborigine people or the Australian government’s mistreatment.  I’ve never been to Australia, but I imagine the experience of feeling like a foreigner in a place where I speak the language might feel (granted, on an entirely different scale) somewhat like the conflicted way I feel about this song.  Regardless, it’s a reminder that I still have a lot to learn about the world.

More on Midnight Oil: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: midnight oil | 1987 | 1980s | columbia records | australia | contradictions |
29 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Valerie (f/ Amy Winehouse)” – Mark Ronson
(Words/music: The Zutons, available on Version, Columbia 2007)

I have little to no interest in Amy Winehouse’s story.  I’m a sucker for backstory, but Winehouse’s sounds like it would just make me angry.  That being said, I think she has a killer voice, and I understand why producer Mark Ronson would work with someone like her.  She possesses a unique voice that oozes personality, immediately attracting attention.  The Zutons’ “Valerie” seems like the perfect star vehicle for her.  Ronson surrounds her with his snappy, soulful production that allows Winehouse to assume the spotlight.  Where the Zutons performed it as a mid-tempo stomp, Ronson and Winehouse turn it into a romp, complete with horns and a lively beat.

My favorite part of the song, no matter how lively it sounds, is that neither Ronson’s production nor Winehouse’s vocals sound rushed.  Ronson stirs up a groove that moves without feeling like it rushes.  His drummer (or his drum machine – I honestly can’t tell, so a credit to him if he’s pulling a fast one on me) sits in that pocket slightly behind the beat.  It’s not dragging; instead, it makes the track feel settled rather than rushed.  It’s a testament to Ronson’s production style that he can make his track feel like it’s played by a well-rehearsed house band.  It might turn some people off, but it’s hard to argue against his abilities as a producer.  Additionally, Winehouse embellishes on the melody a fair amount, yet she never feels like she’s going all out.  Rather than sounding “phoned in,” Winehouse sounds relaxed and even fun as she’s singing the song.  When she does climb up into the higher parts of her register, it’s to serve the song rather than flaunt her vocal prowess.  For someone who comes across so tortured in the media, Winehouse feels like she’s having fun on this one, leading me to think what Back to Black might sound like once she (or rather, if she ever) settles her demons.  She has the potential to become this generation’s most powerful voice if she chooses to put her energy into music.

More on Mark Ronson: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: mark ronson | amy winehouse | the zutons | 2007 | 2000s | track analysis | columbia records |
16 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Hurricane Jane” – Black Kids
(Words/music: Black Kids, available on Partie Traumatic, Almost Gold / Columbia 2008)

In roughly just a year, Black Kids went from obscurity to oversaturation.  This is remarkable on its own, but becomes even more absurd when noting that their debut album came at the end of this stretch.  Pitchfork discovered their Wizard of Ahhhs EP on Myspace and turned this very young band into the most desired band at CMJ 2007.  What followed made perfect sense in retrospect – a band with a wonderful four song demo EP wasn’t road tested and received lukewarm reactions from the same people who eagerly downloaded their EP.  It was, as the Specials put it, “too much too young.”  The band needed time to find their footing and catch up to where expectations demanded they should be.  Unfortunately, Black Kids had to grow in the spotlight, and when they went through the things that most young bands experiences (short sets, clumsy performances), the backlash began.  Still, they deserve a lot of respect for taking Pitchfork’s non-review in stride and (as of last August) becoming a fun, lively band in concert.

It probably didn’t help the band’s case that almost all of their best songs on their debut album came from this demo EP.  However, the versions on Partie Traumatic reflect the growth the band experienced over their year in the limelight.  With Suede’s Bernard Butler behind the board, “Hurricane Jane” becomes far more precise; the guitar line sounds more defined yet still retains similar reverb from the original.  The most notable change occurs when the band slides from this main riff into the verse and from the verse into the chorus – it’s a superior mix where each of the instruments holds its own with the others.  It’s not simply a higher recording budget, though; the band sounds more confident, switching from a low key groove in the verse into the looser and freer chorus.  Yes, there’s a charm to the EP version of the song, but the album version of “Hurricane Jane” will fit in perfectly with the other feel-good pop songs on your summer mix.  Above all, this is a band that’s having fun – and if we expected anything more than a fun, slightly campy record from this band, then we only have our lofty expectations to thank for our disappointment.

More on Black Kids: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: black kids | 2008 | 2000s | track analysis | track comparison | suede | pitchfork | columbia records |
2 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“It Ain’t Me, Babe”– Bob Dylan and Joan Baez
(Words/music: Bob Dylan, available on The Bootleg Series, Volume 6: Live 1964: Concert at Philharmonic Hall, Columbia Records 2004)

I don’t know as much about Bob Dylan as I should, and while I could beat myself up about this gap in my knowledge of music, I look at it as a gradual discovery of these songs.  As I go deeper into Dylan’s catalog, I see all of the different aspects of his personality.  Maybe because I started exploring his songs in my early twenties, I’ve always found the young, slightly angry Dylan the most compelling.  Maybe it was borne out of understanding all of the absurd “new Dylan” talk that gets tossed around, but I find Dylan’s more pointed songs the most interesting.  These songs, like “Positively 4ht Street” or “It Ain’t Me, Babe,” find Dylan somewhat resentful of the spotlight.  After a series of brilliant songs full of youthful optimism, Dylan became a “reluctant spokesperson” for his generation.  Later on, we turned this Dylan into an archetype for any young, disaffected artist that reacts to a spotlight like a deer staring into headlights.  Whenever we do this and evoke Dylan’s name with someone like Conor Oberst or Elliott Smith, we usually cut to something like “Blowin’ in the Wind” rather than “It Ain’t Me, Babe.”  Sure, “new Dylan” is shorthand for a singer who is young, socially conscious, at least moderately literate, and has folk leanings, but it usually draws comparisons to the wrong Dylan.  Many of the songs on Bright Eyes’ Fever and Mirrors or Lifted… albums have more in common with the resentment in the post-electric era rather than the rallying cries in Dylan’s Greenwich Village days.

I’m writing about Bob Dylan tonight because it’s the closest I’m coming to a Fathers’ Day post.  My dad never really played a lot of music around the house but a couple times referred to a time where he skipped swimming practice in high school to go see Bob Dylan perform with some friends.  I’ve selected the version of “It Ain’t Me, Babe” from a 1964 bootleg because I’d like to think that would be what he saw that night he skipped out on practice (minus Joan Baez, I’d imagine).  Even if my dad didn’t pass down records from his youth the way others might (and if I ever have children, the way I probably will innately), he’s always been incredibly supportive of my various musical endeavors.  I remember he bought me my first drum set and drove nearly forty minutes away to go buy it.  He always read my music articles and listened to my radio show (when the internet stream was available) even if he rarely knew (or liked, I imagined) and of the bands.  Most importantly, my dad taught me the merits of perseverance.  He would sing the praises of hard work and consistency when he needed to, but he taught these lessons every day by example.  He’s a living, breathing example of someone who aims to be better every day and approaches it in small, manageable doses.  He’s given my brothers and me encouragement to follow our passions, the resources to be successful, and the space to fail.  From a young age, my parents both taught me to follow the path I wanted to follow, and there’s no way I could spend (at this point) nearly six months of my life trying to learn a little more about music and a lot more about being a better writer without either of them.  So I’m sharing a Bob Dylan post today in part because of my dad’s story, but in part because the way that many idolize Dylan is the way that I idolize my father.  Just as there will never be a “new Dylan,” I don’t want to be a clone of my dad.  Instead, my pursuit to be a damn good version of myself is a tribute to the way that he (and my mom) raised me.

More on Bob Dylan: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: Bob Dylan | 1964 | 1960s | personal reflection | father's day | joan baez | conor oberst | Elliott Smith | columbia records |
3 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“N.Y. State of Mind” – Nas
(Words/music: Nasir Jones and Chris Martin, available on Illmatic, Columbia 1994)

I like hip hop for two distinct reasons – I admire the way rappers use words and I’m amazed by the way DJs and producers set the stage for the MCs.  More often than not, one of these forces takes the lead.  It can be a gifted lyricist crafting vivid images and witty lines over a lackluster beat, or it can be a hypnotic beat (and usually a solid to spectacular hook) that makes an average rapper sound legendary for a few minutes.  In most occasions, I’m drawn in by the track first – if it sounds good, I’ll probably give it a try, and if it sounds great, I’ll play it again.  When Iyrics pull me in first, it’s usually from an over-the-top line (Lil’ Wayne throws these around almost effortlessly) or something so perfect that it’s hard to ignore.  Otherwise, the words take time to unfold, revealing a new part of the story or a new image with each listen.

Even if I love a sublime beat or a perfectly used sample, it’s even more difficult to know when to show restraint.  DJ Premier does this masterfully, creating a beat that’s minimal yet potent.  On one hand, the piano loop and heavy kick drum provide a sparse, ominous backdrop for Nas, who spends part of the track bragging about his skills and part depicting life in Queensbridge.  It’s a smart move by DJ Premier to step out of the way and let Nas shine, as his lyricism deserves the spotlight.  However, Premier manages to keep Nas in the spotlight and make an evocative and complementary track at the same time.  He casts the same shadowy, vaguely threatening feel that Nas cultivates in his lyrics.  Additionally, he also provides some interesting rhythmic counterpoint to Nas’ flow; while Nas rhymes at a steady pace, the slow-moving bass line circles around like a snake coiling, ready to strike.  Even the piano loop has its own distinct rhythm, repeating the same rhythmic pattern to create a trance-like beat.  Once Premier lulls the listener in, Nas lets his rhymes do the damage.

More on Nas: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: nas | 1994 | 1990s | columbia records | dj premier | hip hop | track analysis |
9 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“All the Young Dudes” – Mott the Hoople
(Words/music: David Bowie, available on All the Young Dudes, Columbia 1972)

Mott the Hoople might have made “All the Young Dudes” famous, but David Bowie inhabits every part of the song.  Bowie wrote the song and produced their album, so the similarities make sense.  Still, every single part of the song, from the majestic guitar opening through the soaring choruses, bears Bowie’s trademark.  Sonically, it reminds me of some of Bowie’s other slower paced tracks like “Five Years” or “Life on Mars.”  All three songs move at a slow, almost half-time pace, and build to big, anthemic choruses.  To his credit, Ian Hunter delivers the song as well as Bowie (he sings it live from time to time), even adding his own stamp to the song.  Specifically, I like the way Hunter kind of cheers on the “crowd” during the chorus, addressing them in a series of jubilant spoken fragments.  Even if Bowie set him up to succeed, Hunter and his band made the most of their opportunity.

I’ve loved “All the Young Dudes” for years (even before I knew who David Bowie was!), but Juno changed my relationship with the song.  (Consider this your spoiler warning if you haven’t seen it). When I hear the opening notes begin, I now immediately think of Jason Bateman’s character making a move on Juno, and the same feelings of anger immediately return.  Ironically, a movie I loved took a song I loved and made me associate it with a grown man betraying an emotionally fragile teenager’s trust.  It’s not quite what About Today meant by a “curse song,” but it’s a song that I now have a hard time divorcing from its cinematic association.  I’m not put into a melancholy, introspective moment by the song, but I’m not sure how long it will take me to have the same relationship I once had with it.  Maybe I need to focus my energy elsewhere - away from the anger associated with the scene – and focus it back toward the things that made me love the song in the first place – the soaring arrangement and Hunter’s passionate and weird vocal delivery.

More on Mott the Hoople: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: mott the hoople | 1972 | 1970s | columbia records | David Bowie | juno | jason bateman |
9 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Young Folks” – Peter Bjorn and John
(Words/music: Peter Morén/Björn Yttling, available on Writer’s Block, Columbia 2007)

According to my iTunes library, I haven’t listened to “Young Folks” since September 2007.  This isn’t entirely true, as iTunes records the last time that you finished listening to a song.  So more accurately, I haven’t listened to the entire song in about a year and a half, according to iTunes (there’s a chance I’ve heard it elsewhere, but for argument’s sake I’ll believe my iTunes library).  There’s a perfectly reasonable explanation for this – I got sick of the song.

For whatever reason – whether it’s marketing, or some natural human tendency to overindulge, or something else that I can’t think of at this late hour – we squeeze out every drop out of popular songs.  It’s a sort of backhanded compliment – when a song approaches perfection (take “Hey Ya,” for example) and gains mass appeal, it’s everywhere.  Sure, there are excellent songs that don’t become popular (even in smaller circles), and not every popular song is a future classic, but when these two elements converge, expect to hear a lot of this song.  So in that sense, it’s a compliment that I got sick of “Young Folks.” 

However, “Young Folks” became ubiquitous in a different way – it wasn’t a radio smash (although I’m pretty sure it had some crossover play).  Instead, TV took hold of the whistle melody and used it on everything.  It was hard to turn on a TV that summer without catching a bit of the melody in the background of a commercial or promo.  I understand it – it’s a hell of a melody and the kind of hook that most songwriters would kill to have, however I’m sure that more people know it as an advertising jingle than as a pop song.  Personally, I’m also a fan of the way that the synthesizers enter during the chorus as the bongo slaps rise up in the mix.  It’s a nice moment that serves the chorus well, yet I’m as guilty as everyone else for waiting for the whistling to come back.  Sure, the rest of the song works well, but I’d be lying if I said it would work without the whistling, and since I heard the whistling so many times for far too long, I overdosed on the best part of the song, turning what was once a considerable strength into a frightening reminder of watching too much TV late at night.  Even now, if the song comes up on shuffle, I try to skip it before the whistling makes me think of another ABC commercial running during a SportsCenter repeat.

Ultimately, “Young Folks” is a fine pop song, and every pop gem that suffers fatigue eventually comes back around – “Hey Ya” took about a year after it peaked.  Still, because we were overexposed to just one specific part of the song rather than the entire song, the recovery period will take a little longer.  Hopefully, sometime early next decade I can enjoy “Young Folks” the way I did a couple years ago.

More on Peter Bjorn and John: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: peter bjorn and john | 2007 | 2000s | track analysis | columbia records |
5 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Come Sail Away” – Eric Cartman
(Words/music: Dennis DeYoung, available on Chef Aid: The South Park Album, Columbia 1998)

Styx has an incredible amount of nerd appeal – between writing a futuristic song suite, being featured in almost every Adam Sandler movie, and their canonization by South Park, they’ve made fans out of a generation that wasn’t alive during their heyday.  I understand nerd appeal (and anyone who sees the number of Gizmodo posts I share in my Google Reader shared feed understands that too) but Styx never stuck with me.  Perhaps The Who covered my rock opera needs, I preferred Sandler’s goofier non-musical moments, and I always had a preference for South Park’s original songs.  Still, as a teenager when South Park first came on – old enough to remember when The Simpsons was taboo and still young enough to find Beavis and Butthead’s humor enchanting – I was instantly hooked.  Even now, a full decade later, I still enjoy South Park as a work of biting satire.  Even though they try their best to push the boundaries of taste, Trey Parker and Matt Stone tend to offer social commentary that relies on common sense rather than ideological beliefs.  I often find myself using situations from the show to explain certain ideas, and honestly I’m probably not as embarrassed of it as I should be.

Anyway, “Come Sail Away” works for two main reasons.  Primarily, it’s an exercise in absurdity.  Trey Parker, South Park’s musical mind, gets to sing in his most ridiculous character’s voice on a song that invites him to be even more ridiculous.  In the Cartman character, Parker gets to sing “Come Sail Away” as a self-absorbed egomaniac.  Cartman sounds a little too comfortable in the spotlight during the first half of the song as he exaggerates his annunciation and even speak-sings a couple lines.  Overall, the song pushes towards the limits of absurdity, especially when Cartman starts to squeal in frustration.  Thankfully, the second half of the song saves it from being entirely Cartman’s show, as Issac Hayes’ Chef character hijacks the song for a brief minute, turning the power ballad into a funky bounce that leaves Cartman bewildered.  If Parker plays to his absurdist strengths in his vocal performance, he’s also willing to take advantage of Hayes’ musical gift (an integral part of those early episodes).  Additionally, as with a lot of Parker and Stone’s parodies, an element of sincerity tempers the absurdity of the performance.  The song’s arrangement stays faithful to the original for most of the song aside from a couple deviations.  The bridge even borrows from “Mr. Roboto,” giving a silent nod to another Styx fan (and suggesting that Parker is either a fan or did his research).  It’s the appropriate vehicle for Cartman’s journey to the center of his ego, as it would take the right mix of fist-pumping rock and nerd charm to pull off a cartoon character’s signature single.  In that sense, Styx seems like the perfect choice.

More on South Park: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: eric cartman | south park | trey parker | styx | adam sandler | matt stone | 1998 | columbia records | track analysis | cover song |
10 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Crazy in Love (f/ Jay-Z)” – Beyonce
(Words/music: Shawn Carter, Rich Harrison, Beyoncé Knowles, Eugene Record, available on Dangerously in Love, Columbia Records 2003)

One of my personal reasons for writing this blog was to learn about my taste in music, and while I’ve realized that my taste evolved gradually over time, there are occasional changes in perspective that catch me buy surprise.  Beyonce is an excellent example.  I never really cared for any of the Destiny’s Child singles and can only think of one or two of them off the top of my head.  I remember Destiny’s Child being around, but I never paid much attention to them.  “Crazy in Love” stopped me in my tracks, though.  I loved it instantly, which made putting up with its ubiquity a little easier.  Since then, I’ve enjoyed a handful of Beyonce singles, but none in the same way as “Crazy in Love.”  The question becomes – why did “Crazy in Love” grab hold of me when all of the Destiny’s Child singles couldn’t even grab my attention.

I’m tempted to give credit to the horn riff sampled from the Chi-Lites’ “Are You My Woman” and that’s certainly the attention grabber, but there’s a lot of wonderful things going on underneath these punching horns.  While the horn sample locks the chorus into a steady rhythmic pulse, the beat flows free during the verses.  In particular, the samba cowbells fill the space between the backbeat, letting Beyonce’s vocals dance around the track.  Even though she rarely strays outside of her vocal comfort zone, Beyonce lets the tone of her voice and her personality shine through the vocal mix.  In particular, she delivers the “ut-ohs” in a giddy, machine gun-like stutter that locks right into the beat.  Maybe she was taking note from her beau Jay-Z, who turns in another solid guest verse.  Like Beyonce, Jay’s verse seems focused on creating specific rhythmic patterns, as Jay picks out his allusions and internal rhymes (“handle rock like Van Exel” being my favorite) as much for their sound as for their meaning.  It’s a solid verse, but even Jay-Z, one of hip hop’s biggest stars, knows where the spotlight is on this track and wisely steps out of the spotlight just in time to let Beyonce take that horn riff one more time.  It’s a masterful pop composition because it knows that the focus should be on Beyonce rather than the melody.  Producer Rich Harrison lets the horns announce pop’s new queen and then knows enough to reduce them down to occasional accents in the verse, letting Beyonce charm her way to the top.

More on Beyonce: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: beyonce | 2003 | 2000s | columbia records | jay-z | track analysis | pop |
1 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Raw Power” – Iggy & The Stooges
(Words/music: Iggy Pop and James Williamson, available on Raw Power, Columbia 1973)

Two things stand out when I listen to “Raw Power.”  First, the entire track sounds heavy.  This isn’t heavy in a “hard rock” way, but rather that it has a thick, full sound.  It’s not as sinister sounding as “I Wanna Be Your Dog” or as edgy as “Search and Destroy.”  Instead, “Raw Power” relies on a thick, chugging guitar riff trudging through the entire track.  It’s a full sounding guitar heavy on low end (as some of those other Stooges songs sound a little tinny) and it almost gives the impression of being doubled or tripled.  This riff also gives Iggy Pop room to be more flexible in his vocal delivery.  While he shared the spotlight on other Stooges tracks, “Raw Power” puts Iggy Pop squarely in the spotlight.  Appropriately, he sings in a deeper voice (a voice that I think he grows into by the late 70s) while also starting to let loose.  He cultivates this tone that’s equal parts sneer, growl, and squeal.  By the time James Williamson strangles a solo out of his guitar in the final minute, Iggy Pop has worked himself into such a frenzy as he maintains pace with this onslaught of guitar.  It’s the moment on the Raw Power album where Pop fully puts himself in the center of the stage, and Pop sounds completely in control on this track.

While there’s such a heavy (and yes, raw) quality to the song, a few elements seem out of place.  Specifically, the piano and the sleigh bells are odd for such a heavy song.  In particular, the twinkling piano line (which sounds like a single repeated note) contrasts with the chugging riff and Pop’s manic vocals.  I like how it’s used almost like a triangle, as the note locks in with the rest of the band.  It’s appropriate that “Raw Power” would bring the piano back to its roots as a percussion instrument, as its relentless feel might inspire listeners to start bashing along.  Still, the high note is an interesting choice that seems designed to cut through the rest of the arrangement.  I can’t help but wonder if it’s a slightly subversive choice; even in such a heavy track with one of Pop’s definitive vocal performances, this single, high-pitched note remains prominent in the mix just enough to distract our attention away, only to get sucker punched by that mammoth riff waiting for us when we turn back around.

More on Iggy & the Stooges: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: iggy and the stooges | iggy pop | the stooges | 1973 | 1970s | columbia records | hard rock |
8 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“That’s Not My Name” – The Ting Tings
(Words/music: Jules De Martino and Katie White, available on We Started Nothing, Columbia 2008)

I’ve revealed that I’m a sucker for catchy songs, but I still demand something else – some interesting chords, skillful lyrics, a killer drum beat – otherwise I’d listen to instrumental music all day.   That being said, “That’s Not My Name” is the kind of thing I would have hated if I first heard the hook.  Katie White sounds like a cross between Toni Basil and any of those female mallpunk brats who put out singles (take your pick).  I appreciate her attitude (and it’s her attitude and De Martino’s bass drum that get me through the first minute and a half of the song), but it gets a bit grating when the entire focus rests on her voice; it’s more of a gimmick than a leading player.  Unfortunately, this is the part of the song that gets clipped in a commercial.  Thankfully, in the States at least, it’s not as ubiquitous as “Shut Up and Let Me Go,” or I might actively loathe this song.

When the second chorus begins, things start to get more interesting.  De Martino enters with a second contrasting vocal line as White keeps on telling us names that won’t solicit a reply from her.  Then, her sloganeering stops and her sneer becomes a song.  While White doesn’t sing like a seraphim, it’s a welcome break after being yelled at for two minutes.  The track then rebuilds on this vocal line – the drums join back in with hand claps and some guitar effects.  Then, White’s shout returns, followed by De Martino’s line, followed by some more prominent guitar.  They took the first two minutes of the song and essentially scrapped it for parts – we never return to the drums and shouting at the beginning, but the duo put the parts back together over this new bed, adding in a few new wrinkles along the way.  It’s kind of like a remix mid song, and knowing that the best part comes during the final minute (ironically, the song is a solid minute too long, but I’d cut something from the middle) means that I’ll spend the first three and a half waiting for it to build up to this point.  It’s an instance where knowing how the story ends makes reading the prologue a bit more satisfying.

More on The Ting Tings: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: 2000s | 2008 | annoying first impression | columbia records | pop | the ting tings | toni basil | track analysis |
2 Tumblr Notes

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

“Rosalita (Come Out Tonight)” – Bruce Springsteen
(Words/music: Bruce Springsteen, available on The Wild, The Innocent, & the E-Street Shuffle, Columbia Records 1973)

Earlier tonight at the Super Bowl, we saw Popular Bruce, as the E-Street band tore through abbreviated versions of “Tenth Avenue Freeze-Out,” “Born to Run,” “Working on a Dream,” and a crowd pleasing version of “Glory Days.”  Sure, there were other songs I wanted to hear (most of which would have tipped the running time over the twelve allotted minutes, as there were still thirty minutes of football) but I understood the selection.  Tonight’s set served as an introduction to the uninitiated or alternately, as Springsteen said this afternoon – “a twelve minute party” (and a twelve minute commercial for his new album and forthcoming tour).  It served its purpose – it was a fun set and a worth halftime show – a reward for those who stuck with the game through halftime.

While Springsteen has enjoyed wild amount of popularity, his more important (and more resonating) role is as Populist Bruce.  Some of this reputation comes from the E-Street Band’s lengthy tours and marathon concerts, but ultimately the show matters little without substance.  Springsteen’s best songs read like melodic short stories – he crafts characters with an eye for detail and empathy that most authors would kill for – so much so that many have lifted these characters from their songs and gave them their own stories.  For example, I just recently came across a book titled Meeting Across the River – a collection of stories that are all based on the short song at the end of Born to Run.  After halftime, I pulled Bruce Springsteen’s America: The People Listening, A Poet Singing off my shelf and flipped through it (remembering that I started but never finished it).  Robert Coles collected ten stories of Americans from many walks of life connecting with different songs in Springsteen’s catalogue.  Even searching Amazon for links to those two books brought up plenty more books that I haven’t seen – many of which go beyond the tired biographical route that gluts up the music section at Barnes & Noble.  These songs, and ultimately these characters, stick with so many people, myself included, because they seem real.  We know Mary and Sandy and the narrator in “Thunder Road” or the guy described in “Glory Days.”

Still, to me, “Rosalita” embodies all of the qualities I love about Bruce Springsteen’s catalog. Musically it’s seven minutes of unadulterated fun – all saxophone, Hammond organ, and the kind of drums I’d play after drinking an entire pot of coffee.  Lyrically, Springsteen describes a lover desperately trying to court a woman who’s out of his league (at least socially, as her parents try to keep them apart).  The arc is as old as time – Romeo & Juliet, Great Expectations, hell, even Slumdog Millionaire are all tales of unrequited or inaccessible love – but Springsteen puts his twist on it by casting himself in the song (or, at least drawing on his own experience as a struggling, working class rocker).  The last two verses – including that flawless call and response section with his background singers – rank among Springsteen’s best vocal performances.  At this point, he merges the youthful exuberance on his first two albums with desperation and passion that foreshadowed the creative leap he’d take on Born to Run.  It’s the Young Boss singing for sure – he wants Rosie to come on out and have a good time, but never loses his charm when faced with adversity.

More on Bruce Springsteen: Allmusic | Amazon MP3 | Emusic | Last.fm

TAGGED UNDER: 1970s | 1973 | Bruce Springsteen | Columbia Records | professional football | somewhat dubious comparison to literature | songs that align with historical events | track analysis | classic rock |
Based on a theme created by: Roy David Farber and Hunson. Powered By: Tumblr | Email SSC
1 of 1
Email Me: Email No spam please.